Man, this is an overwhelming amount of information to grasp Nora! You are exceedingly knowledgeable in a journalist world of truth and history. As I read, and listened to all the video clips, what’s happening in the world I see today, at least here in Canada, you have described exactly……with detailed, accurate backup.
I would like to draw attention to “The Toronto Protocols (6.6.6.)” document which was leaked by Serge Monast in Canada in 1995. It is reported to be the plan of an elite group who are manipulating the general public and governments across the world to bring about their long term goal of a one-world government. It has 34 pages and is definitely worth a download to enable a careful read. Pierre Trudeau, supposed father of Canada’s current PM, and once a PM of Canada, was one of the group known as “the 6.6.6.”. The involvement of world figures and organizations is both shocking and terrifying.
Everyone must read The Fabian Manifesto … it explains the plan in detail. I read it for the first time during Covid & knew we were way along in the plan .. I believe we are at the end .. all new high tech security & infrastructure updates … installed globally .. was the reason for lockdowns …
This enables all their security nightmares .. globally ..
My reaction to this is that liberty is losing because we are fighting a nameless and faceless enemy. How does the army of international Patriots coalesce without a sense of where the battle line is? It is helpful to name and identify the enemy. This is information toward that end, but it may be too esoteric to gain traction. How do we take this anger and willingness to fight, and channel it into a useful direction? Who are the enemy generals that need to be captured or slain? That would be the really useful information to have.
Very simply, the enemy of personal Liberty and Rights are anyone and everyone who is an adherent of the UN-WEF-WHO-BIS Technocracy, and that includes all of the British Royalty, Black Nobility, foundations, think tanks, NGOs, corporatists, and banksters who fund the UN-WEF-WHO-BIS cabal and their Agenda 21/2030 “Build Back Better” Green New Deal.
WWIII = Nationalism/Republicanism/Platonism Vs. Globalism/Oligarchism/Aristotelianism
Are You Outraged and Feel a Sense of Disgust and Hopelessness?
If you are outraged by all of the madness everywhere you look, then know that the world is intentionally being driven mad as a strategy to conquer the world by demoralizing and weakening the people.
Your outrage is precisely the response that the Globalist Fascist Oligarchy are hoping to elicit from you and everyone else. The Globalist Fascist Oligarchy are doing everything that they can to instigate “The Great Collapse of Society” until people are demoralized to the point where they will sacrifice their Liberty & Rights to make the madness stop. That’s when the Globalist Fascist Oligarchy will step in and offer peace and tranquillity and serenity all in exchange for the people subordinating themselves to the dictates spewed out by the UN-WEF-WHO-BIS Technocracy, and those dictates will be enforced by “Global NATO.”
“The Great Collapse of Society”
The Frankfurt School and “Critical Theory”
The Frankfurt School, or Institute for Social Research, was set up by a group of Marxist intellectuals in Germany in 1923, affiliated to the University of Frankfurt and independently of the Communist Party, which has been influential in the development of Marxist theory ever since.
The Frankfurt School believed that as long as an individual had the belief – or even the hope of belief – that his divine gift of reason could solve the problems facing society, then that society would never reach the state of hopelessness and alienation that they considered necessary to provoke socialist revolution. Their task, therefore, was as swiftly as possible to undermine the Judeo-Christian legacy. To do this they called for the most negative destructive criticism possible of every sphere of life which would be designed to de-stabilize society and bring down what they saw as the ‘oppressive’ order. Their policies, they hoped, would spread like a virus—‘continuing the work of the Western Marxists by other means’ as one of their members noted.
To further advance their ‘quiet’ incremental cultural revolution (Fabian Socialism) – but giving us no ideas about their plans for the future – the School recommended (among other things):
Divide and Conquer.
The oppressed and their oppressors.
1. The creation of racism offenses.
2. Continual change to create confusion.
3. The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children.
4. The undermining of schools’ and teachers’ authority.
5. Huge immigration to destroy identity.
6. The promotion of excessive drinking/drug abuse.
7. Emptying of churches.
8. An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime.
9. Dependency on the state or state benefits.
10. Control and dumbing down of media.
11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family.
One of the main ideas of the Frankfurt School was to exploit Freud’s idea of ‘pan-sexualism’ – the search for pleasure, the exploitation of the differences between the sexes, the overthrowing of traditional relationships between men and women.
To further their aims they would:
• attack the authority of the father, deny the specific roles of father and mother, and wrest away from families their rights as primary educators of their children.
• abolish differences in the education of boys and girls
• abolish all forms of male dominance – hence the presence of women in the armed forces
• declare women to be an ‘oppressed class’ and men as ‘oppressors.’
WWIII = Nationalism/Republicanism/Platonism Vs. Globalism/Oligarchism/Aristotelianism
Venice’s War Against Western Civilization
Oligarchism is a principle of irrational domination associated with hereditary oligarchy/nobility and with certain aristocratic priesthoods. At the center of oligarchy is the idea that certain families are born to rule as an arbitrary elite, while the vast majority of any given population is condemned to oppression, serfdom, or slavery. During most of the past 2,500 years, oligarchs have been identified by their support for the philosophical writings of Aristotle and their rejection of the epistemology of Plato. Aristotle asserted that slavery is a necessary institution, because some are born to rule and others to be ruled. He also reduced the question of human knowledge to the crudest sense certainty and perception of “facts.” Aristotle’s formalism is a means of killing human creativity, and therefore represents absolute evil. This evil is expressed by the bestialist view of the oligarchs that human beings are the same as animals.
Oligarchs identify wealth purely in money terms, and practice usury, monetarism, and looting at the expense of technological advancement and physical production. Oligarchs have always been associated with the arbitrary rejection of true scientific discovery and scientific method in favor of open anti-science or more subtle obscurantist pseudo-science. The oligarchy has believed for millennia that the Earth is overpopulated; the oligarchical commentary on the Trojan War was that this conflict was necessary in order to prevent greater numbers of mankind from oppressing “Mother Earth.” The oligarchy has constantly stressed race and racial characteristics, often as a means for justifying slavery. In international affairs, oligarchs recommend such methods as geopolitics, understood as the method of “divide and conquer,” which lets one power prevail by playing its adversaries one against the other. Oligarchical policy strives to maintain a balance of power among such adversaries for its own benefit, but this attempt always fails in the long run and leads to new wars.
The essence of oligarchism is summed up in the idea of the empire, in which an elite identifying itself as a master race rules over a degraded mass of slaves or other oppressed victims. If oligarchical methods are allowed to dominate human affairs, they always create a breakdown crisis of civilization, with economic depression, war, famine, plague, and pestilence. Examples of this are the Fourteenth-century Black Plague and the Thirty Years War (1618-48), both of which were created by Venetian intelligence. The post-industrial society and the derivatives crisis have brought about the potential for a new collapse of civilization in our own time. This crisis can only be reversed by repudiating in practice the axioms of the oligarchical mentality.
The ‘Fondo’
A pillar of the oligarchical system is the family fortune, or fondo, as it is called in Italian. The continuity of the family fortune which earns money through usury and looting is often more important than the biological continuity across generations of the family that owns the fortune. In Venice, the largest fondo was the endowment of the Basilica of St. Mark, which was closely associated with the Venetian state treasury, and which absorbed the family fortunes of nobles who died without heirs. This fondo was administered by the procurers of St. Mark, whose position was one of the most powerful under the Venetian system. Around this central fondo were grouped the individual family fortunes of the great oligarchical families, such as the Mocenigo, the Cornaro, the Dandolo, the Contarini, the Morosini, the Zorzi, and the Tron. Until the end of the Eighteenth century, the dozen or so wealthiest Venetian families had holdings comparable or superior to the very wealthiest families anywhere in Europe. When the Venetian oligarchy transferred many of its families and assets to northern Europe, the Venetian fondi provided the nucleus of the great Bank of Amsterdam, which dominated Europe during the Seventeenth century, and of the Bank of England, which became the leading bank of the Eighteenth century.
Nicolaus of Cusa, Towering Genius of the Renaissance
By Helga Zepp LaRouche
The Fifteenth-century philosopher and statesman Cardinal Nicolaus of Cusa wedded the best developments of Northern Europe and Renaissance Italy: He was the first to enunciate the principle of representative government for the modern nation-state. His Platonist philosophical method, the ‘Coincidence of Opposites,’ destroyed scholastic Aristotelianism, and cleared the way for all subsequent scientific progress. And, in the realm of statecraft, he charted a path of ecumenical dialogue, founded upon the commonality of man’s participation in universal Creation.
Aristocracy and oligarchy are both forms of government in which the society is ruled by a small group of people. However, there are some key differences. Most significantly, while aristocracy is “rule by the best,” oligarchy is “rule by the few.”
Aristocracies are comprised of individuals considered best fit to rule because of their nobility—a level of moral and intellectual superiority that is assumed to have been genetically passed down through family lines. Oligarchies, on the other hand, are made up of people who are simply more wealthy and powerful than the rest of the population. In the words of Aristotle, “…wherever men rule by reason of their wealth, whether they be few or many, that is an oligarchy.”
Since their position is typically insured through inheritance, aristocrats tend to act in the best interest of society. In contrast, oligarchs, whose status is typically dependent on maintaining their current level of wealth, tend to act out of their economic self-interest. In this manner, oligarchy is often associated with corruption, oppression, and tyranny.
My grandfather back in the mid 80’s was sounding the alarm of the communist take over in the United States. At the time I was pretty young and didn’t see it as clear as I do today. After stepping out of my comfort zone right after the 2020 election and putting boots on the ground. It is way worse than I had thought.
What do Milton Friedman, Hayek, Mises, the Austrian School of Economics, the Chicago School of Economics, Hillsdale College, the Heritage Foundation, and the Mount Pelerin Society all have in common…..Nazi Fascism and the quest for a One-World Government.
Please share with Richard Poe for inclusion in his forthcoming book on the History of Globalism.
We have included in this Special Report excerpts of Henry A. Kissinger's treasonous bragging before a British audience at London's Royal Institute for International Affairs (RIIA) (Chatham House) on May 10. The excerpts should bring a surge of angry blood to the face ofevery patriot ofthe United States.
We have but to add two indispensable comments. First, we summarize, to the extent of our own knowledge, the process by which we have come to know Kissinger's treasonous remarks to be true. Second, we employ the principles of constitutional law which must guide every President of the United States in judging whether Kissinger's admissions are treasonous in fact under the clear intent of the U .S. Constitution.
Kissinger insists that since no later than the term of office of Secretary of State Jimmy Byrne [June 1945-January 1947], the foreign policy of the United States has been dictated from London by means ofsecret, unwritten agreements between certain U.S. officials and the Royal government. It is the documentable knowledge of myself and my associates that there are many important instances corroborating Kissinger's claims on this point. Equally important, we are well informed, if certainly not completely knowl edgable, concerning the special, unofficial channels of "secret government" through which successive presidencies have been manipulated into submit ting to such unlawful forms of foreign-policy pictates by Britain.
Any good attorney would not be satisfied with our documentary proofof what we report, although for every claim we submit we have massive proof. A good attorney would demand to know at least the essentials of the process by which we were guided to discover such evidence. In a good practice of law, no evidence, however massive, is conclusive until adequate evidence has been added respecting the way in which submitted proofs were developed.
Therefore, it is our proper duty to account for the process by which we began to uncover the treasonous role of Henry Kissinger, beginning January
Fabianism was simply British adoption of Karl Kautsky’s Democratic Socialism. Anyone who has ever read Kautsky would understand this. There is nothing new under the sun.
Man, this is an overwhelming amount of information to grasp Nora! You are exceedingly knowledgeable in a journalist world of truth and history. As I read, and listened to all the video clips, what’s happening in the world I see today, at least here in Canada, you have described exactly……with detailed, accurate backup.
I would like to draw attention to “The Toronto Protocols (6.6.6.)” document which was leaked by Serge Monast in Canada in 1995. It is reported to be the plan of an elite group who are manipulating the general public and governments across the world to bring about their long term goal of a one-world government. It has 34 pages and is definitely worth a download to enable a careful read. Pierre Trudeau, supposed father of Canada’s current PM, and once a PM of Canada, was one of the group known as “the 6.6.6.”. The involvement of world figures and organizations is both shocking and terrifying.
https://archive.org/details/toronto_protocols_666_20230218_1604
Everyone must read The Fabian Manifesto … it explains the plan in detail. I read it for the first time during Covid & knew we were way along in the plan .. I believe we are at the end .. all new high tech security & infrastructure updates … installed globally .. was the reason for lockdowns …
This enables all their security nightmares .. globally ..
I don’t see a way out at this point 🤷♀️
Brilliant. Sharing far and wide.
My reaction to this is that liberty is losing because we are fighting a nameless and faceless enemy. How does the army of international Patriots coalesce without a sense of where the battle line is? It is helpful to name and identify the enemy. This is information toward that end, but it may be too esoteric to gain traction. How do we take this anger and willingness to fight, and channel it into a useful direction? Who are the enemy generals that need to be captured or slain? That would be the really useful information to have.
Very simply, the enemy of personal Liberty and Rights are anyone and everyone who is an adherent of the UN-WEF-WHO-BIS Technocracy, and that includes all of the British Royalty, Black Nobility, foundations, think tanks, NGOs, corporatists, and banksters who fund the UN-WEF-WHO-BIS cabal and their Agenda 21/2030 “Build Back Better” Green New Deal.
WWIII = Nationalism/Republicanism/Platonism Vs. Globalism/Oligarchism/Aristotelianism
I’m as mad as Hell, and I’m not going to take this anymore!
Speech from Movie: Network (1976)
https://youtu.be/ZwMVMbmQBug?si=BEdupsRGPYtu6ZMP
Are You Outraged and Feel a Sense of Disgust and Hopelessness?
If you are outraged by all of the madness everywhere you look, then know that the world is intentionally being driven mad as a strategy to conquer the world by demoralizing and weakening the people.
Your outrage is precisely the response that the Globalist Fascist Oligarchy are hoping to elicit from you and everyone else. The Globalist Fascist Oligarchy are doing everything that they can to instigate “The Great Collapse of Society” until people are demoralized to the point where they will sacrifice their Liberty & Rights to make the madness stop. That’s when the Globalist Fascist Oligarchy will step in and offer peace and tranquillity and serenity all in exchange for the people subordinating themselves to the dictates spewed out by the UN-WEF-WHO-BIS Technocracy, and those dictates will be enforced by “Global NATO.”
“The Great Collapse of Society”
The Frankfurt School and “Critical Theory”
The Frankfurt School, or Institute for Social Research, was set up by a group of Marxist intellectuals in Germany in 1923, affiliated to the University of Frankfurt and independently of the Communist Party, which has been influential in the development of Marxist theory ever since.
The Frankfurt School believed that as long as an individual had the belief – or even the hope of belief – that his divine gift of reason could solve the problems facing society, then that society would never reach the state of hopelessness and alienation that they considered necessary to provoke socialist revolution. Their task, therefore, was as swiftly as possible to undermine the Judeo-Christian legacy. To do this they called for the most negative destructive criticism possible of every sphere of life which would be designed to de-stabilize society and bring down what they saw as the ‘oppressive’ order. Their policies, they hoped, would spread like a virus—‘continuing the work of the Western Marxists by other means’ as one of their members noted.
To further advance their ‘quiet’ incremental cultural revolution (Fabian Socialism) – but giving us no ideas about their plans for the future – the School recommended (among other things):
Divide and Conquer.
The oppressed and their oppressors.
1. The creation of racism offenses.
2. Continual change to create confusion.
3. The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children.
4. The undermining of schools’ and teachers’ authority.
5. Huge immigration to destroy identity.
6. The promotion of excessive drinking/drug abuse.
7. Emptying of churches.
8. An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime.
9. Dependency on the state or state benefits.
10. Control and dumbing down of media.
11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family.
One of the main ideas of the Frankfurt School was to exploit Freud’s idea of ‘pan-sexualism’ – the search for pleasure, the exploitation of the differences between the sexes, the overthrowing of traditional relationships between men and women.
To further their aims they would:
• attack the authority of the father, deny the specific roles of father and mother, and wrest away from families their rights as primary educators of their children.
• abolish differences in the education of boys and girls
• abolish all forms of male dominance – hence the presence of women in the armed forces
• declare women to be an ‘oppressed class’ and men as ‘oppressors.’
https://open.substack.com/pub/william3n4z2/p/are-you-outraged-and-feel-a-sense?r=1kb28q&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Merely Being aware of the Orwellian tactics does absolutely no good UNLESS the people are additionally willing to fully NOT COMPLY.
The Invisible Government
by Dan Smoot (1962)
How the Deep State and Intelligence Community got their start.
The origin and early history of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).
https://archive.org/details/B-001-014-093
Hillary Clinton saying the CFR is where the State Department gets its marching orders:
https://youtu.be/Ba9wxl1Dmas?si=bIdvQUXOxBYFQIK9
Dick Cheney revealing that he was once a Director of the CFR, but he hid that fact from his constituents in Wyoming:
https://youtu.be/BbnpN07J_zg
"They are determined to convert this Republic into a socialist province of a one-world socialist system." –– I shared Smoot's book in my previous post, too: https://noorbinladin.substack.com/p/keep-calm-and-stay-frosty
WWIII = Nationalism/Republicanism/Platonism Vs. Globalism/Oligarchism/Aristotelianism
Venice’s War Against Western Civilization
Oligarchism is a principle of irrational domination associated with hereditary oligarchy/nobility and with certain aristocratic priesthoods. At the center of oligarchy is the idea that certain families are born to rule as an arbitrary elite, while the vast majority of any given population is condemned to oppression, serfdom, or slavery. During most of the past 2,500 years, oligarchs have been identified by their support for the philosophical writings of Aristotle and their rejection of the epistemology of Plato. Aristotle asserted that slavery is a necessary institution, because some are born to rule and others to be ruled. He also reduced the question of human knowledge to the crudest sense certainty and perception of “facts.” Aristotle’s formalism is a means of killing human creativity, and therefore represents absolute evil. This evil is expressed by the bestialist view of the oligarchs that human beings are the same as animals.
Oligarchs identify wealth purely in money terms, and practice usury, monetarism, and looting at the expense of technological advancement and physical production. Oligarchs have always been associated with the arbitrary rejection of true scientific discovery and scientific method in favor of open anti-science or more subtle obscurantist pseudo-science. The oligarchy has believed for millennia that the Earth is overpopulated; the oligarchical commentary on the Trojan War was that this conflict was necessary in order to prevent greater numbers of mankind from oppressing “Mother Earth.” The oligarchy has constantly stressed race and racial characteristics, often as a means for justifying slavery. In international affairs, oligarchs recommend such methods as geopolitics, understood as the method of “divide and conquer,” which lets one power prevail by playing its adversaries one against the other. Oligarchical policy strives to maintain a balance of power among such adversaries for its own benefit, but this attempt always fails in the long run and leads to new wars.
The essence of oligarchism is summed up in the idea of the empire, in which an elite identifying itself as a master race rules over a degraded mass of slaves or other oppressed victims. If oligarchical methods are allowed to dominate human affairs, they always create a breakdown crisis of civilization, with economic depression, war, famine, plague, and pestilence. Examples of this are the Fourteenth-century Black Plague and the Thirty Years War (1618-48), both of which were created by Venetian intelligence. The post-industrial society and the derivatives crisis have brought about the potential for a new collapse of civilization in our own time. This crisis can only be reversed by repudiating in practice the axioms of the oligarchical mentality.
The ‘Fondo’
A pillar of the oligarchical system is the family fortune, or fondo, as it is called in Italian. The continuity of the family fortune which earns money through usury and looting is often more important than the biological continuity across generations of the family that owns the fortune. In Venice, the largest fondo was the endowment of the Basilica of St. Mark, which was closely associated with the Venetian state treasury, and which absorbed the family fortunes of nobles who died without heirs. This fondo was administered by the procurers of St. Mark, whose position was one of the most powerful under the Venetian system. Around this central fondo were grouped the individual family fortunes of the great oligarchical families, such as the Mocenigo, the Cornaro, the Dandolo, the Contarini, the Morosini, the Zorzi, and the Tron. Until the end of the Eighteenth century, the dozen or so wealthiest Venetian families had holdings comparable or superior to the very wealthiest families anywhere in Europe. When the Venetian oligarchy transferred many of its families and assets to northern Europe, the Venetian fondi provided the nucleus of the great Bank of Amsterdam, which dominated Europe during the Seventeenth century, and of the Bank of England, which became the leading bank of the Eighteenth century.
https://archive.schillerinstitute.com/fid_91-96/952_venice.html
Nicolaus of Cusa, Towering Genius of the Renaissance
By Helga Zepp LaRouche
The Fifteenth-century philosopher and statesman Cardinal Nicolaus of Cusa wedded the best developments of Northern Europe and Renaissance Italy: He was the first to enunciate the principle of representative government for the modern nation-state. His Platonist philosophical method, the ‘Coincidence of Opposites,’ destroyed scholastic Aristotelianism, and cleared the way for all subsequent scientific progress. And, in the realm of statecraft, he charted a path of ecumenical dialogue, founded upon the commonality of man’s participation in universal Creation.
https://archive.schillerinstitute.com/fidelio_archive/2001/fidv10n02-2001Su/fidv10n02-2001Su_014-nicolaus_of_cusa_towering_genius-hzl.pdf
Aristotle’s Defense of Slavery
https://1000wordphilosophy.com/2019/09/10/aristotles-defense-of-slavery/
Aristocracy Vs Oligarchy
Aristocracy and oligarchy are both forms of government in which the society is ruled by a small group of people. However, there are some key differences. Most significantly, while aristocracy is “rule by the best,” oligarchy is “rule by the few.”
Aristocracies are comprised of individuals considered best fit to rule because of their nobility—a level of moral and intellectual superiority that is assumed to have been genetically passed down through family lines. Oligarchies, on the other hand, are made up of people who are simply more wealthy and powerful than the rest of the population. In the words of Aristotle, “…wherever men rule by reason of their wealth, whether they be few or many, that is an oligarchy.”
Since their position is typically insured through inheritance, aristocrats tend to act in the best interest of society. In contrast, oligarchs, whose status is typically dependent on maintaining their current level of wealth, tend to act out of their economic self-interest. In this manner, oligarchy is often associated with corruption, oppression, and tyranny.
https://www.thoughtco.com/aristocracy-definition-and-examples-5111953
You are the best Noor. Thank you as always.
Keep up the good work!
My grandfather back in the mid 80’s was sounding the alarm of the communist take over in the United States. At the time I was pretty young and didn’t see it as clear as I do today. After stepping out of my comfort zone right after the 2020 election and putting boots on the ground. It is way worse than I had thought.
At this point, we'll have to settle for small victories. If Britain, the head of the snake, can be destroyed from within, that's a win.
Excellent summary, well done. Ingsoc is indeed real.
Noor 👍💯❤️
Ever heard of the Mont Pelerin Society?
What do Milton Friedman, Hayek, Mises, the Austrian School of Economics, the Chicago School of Economics, Hillsdale College, the Heritage Foundation, and the Mount Pelerin Society all have in common…..Nazi Fascism and the quest for a One-World Government.
Please share with Richard Poe for inclusion in his forthcoming book on the History of Globalism.
The Ugly Truth About Milton Friedman
by Lyndon H LaRouche Jr and David Goldman
https://archive.org/details/the_ugly_truth_about_milton_friedman
Mont Pelerin's hatchetman: Milton Friedman
by David Goldman
https://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/1980/eirv07n28-19800722/eirv07n28-19800722_022-mont_pelerins_hatchetman_milton.pdf
Profile of Thurn and Taxis
by David Goldman, EIR Economics Editor
Part I
“Were an atom bomb to destroy all of America, our family nonetheless would survive”
https://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/1982/eirv09n21-19820601/eirv09n21-19820601_006-were_an_atomic_bomb_to_destroy_a.pdf
Part II
The Venetian intelligence directorate and the Hapsburgs' financial empire
https://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/1982/eirv09n22-19820608/eirv09n22-19820608_007-the_venetian_intelligence_direct.pdf
Part III
In the crypt of the heirs to the Hapsburg Empire
https://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/1982/eirv09n24-19820622/eirv09n24-19820622_011-in_the_crypt_of_the_heirs_to_the.pdf
Kissinger boasts of three decades of treason
by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.
We have included in this Special Report excerpts of Henry A. Kissinger's treasonous bragging before a British audience at London's Royal Institute for International Affairs (RIIA) (Chatham House) on May 10. The excerpts should bring a surge of angry blood to the face ofevery patriot ofthe United States.
We have but to add two indispensable comments. First, we summarize, to the extent of our own knowledge, the process by which we have come to know Kissinger's treasonous remarks to be true. Second, we employ the principles of constitutional law which must guide every President of the United States in judging whether Kissinger's admissions are treasonous in fact under the clear intent of the U .S. Constitution.
Kissinger insists that since no later than the term of office of Secretary of State Jimmy Byrne [June 1945-January 1947], the foreign policy of the United States has been dictated from London by means ofsecret, unwritten agreements between certain U.S. officials and the Royal government. It is the documentable knowledge of myself and my associates that there are many important instances corroborating Kissinger's claims on this point. Equally important, we are well informed, if certainly not completely knowl edgable, concerning the special, unofficial channels of "secret government" through which successive presidencies have been manipulated into submit ting to such unlawful forms of foreign-policy pictates by Britain.
Any good attorney would not be satisfied with our documentary proofof what we report, although for every claim we submit we have massive proof. A good attorney would demand to know at least the essentials of the process by which we were guided to discover such evidence. In a good practice of law, no evidence, however massive, is conclusive until adequate evidence has been added respecting the way in which submitted proofs were developed.
Therefore, it is our proper duty to account for the process by which we began to uncover the treasonous role of Henry Kissinger, beginning January
1974.
https://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/1982/eirv09n21-19820601/eirv09n21-19820601.php
Fabianism was simply British adoption of Karl Kautsky’s Democratic Socialism. Anyone who has ever read Kautsky would understand this. There is nothing new under the sun.