Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Steven C.'s avatar

I think we should not lose sight of the fact that the WHO, like any other multi-national organization, can't make any country comply. The accord will be used as an excuse for politicians and bureaucrats to deny any responsibility for future actions. They will say "We don't really want to do these things to you, but what can we do; we have to comply!" We are being gaslit into believing that these organizations and agreements constitute some sort of world government. Remember that the U.S withdrew from UNESCO twice. The funding of these organizations and the enforcement of their decisions comes 100% from the sovereign states that voluntarily chose to belong.

Expand full comment
Morgan Montego's avatar

Thank you, Noor, for all of your work on deciphering the WHO 'accords', and getting the word out. Thanks to James also.

I'm wondering if the language of these 'accords' might allow some extreme measures to be taken, even beyond a pandemic like cov-19.

I think it's possible that Tedros, et al, will also be able to declare a 'global mental health emergency', and declare that mis-, mal-, and dis-information are disrupting the mental health of the entire planet, and therefore there immediate censorship measures need to be implemented worldwide. Maybe censorship and requiring the population to be prescribed tranquilizers and sedatives.

Maybe they might declare population growth is out of control and has reached global emergency status. They could mandate measures which would be catastrophic mentally, physically, and spiritually.

These are just a few more of the problems which could arise from these dangerous accords.

I'm with you. Two months to flatten the WHO!

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts