Two Months to Flatten the WHO.
Our podcast series with James Roguski continues.
In February, James Roguski and I recorded an episode for my podcast, Noor Bin Ladin Calls…, entitled “Important Update on the WHO”. I posted about it here.
We have since recorded another episode, “Two Months to Flatten the WHO”, in reference to the WHO’s upcoming World Health Assembly (WHA).
I strongly encourage you watch both videos as no one breaks down what is actually going on with the WHO like James. They are quite long, precisely because there is so much to unpack and clarify.
Considering the layers of obfuscation and deliberate confusion, it is important to understand the various mechanisms, instruments and interplay between the WHO, our governments and other “stakeholders”.
In our conversations, James answers critical questions: who is driving the WHO? What is the WHO’s role? What is the “pandemic treaty” really about? Is it even a treaty? What is the difference between the amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) and the “treaty”? What about nations’ sovereignty, is the WHO really going to take that away?
We will be putting out more episodes in the lead up to 77th WHA, which will take place from May 27 to June 1, 2024. It is during this WHA that both final versions of the amendments to the IHR and the “treaty” will be presented and adopted by WHO member states.
While there are many distractions, real and fake, it is essential that we do not lose sight of what our "leaders” are devising with the help of the WHO, as our way of life stands to be upended in ways we have not yet seen. The so-called covid pandemic measures will seem mild in comparison should they succeed with their plans.
It is up to us to share this information to help raise awareness as to what is at stake in the first place, and to ultimately, hopefully, flatten the WHO.
Follow James on Substack to make sure you are up to date with his excellent reporting, and subscribe to my Rumble channel for future calls. You can also reach James on this number +1 310-619-3055 to speak with him directly (he answers!).
The Author certifies this article is one hundred percent human made and that no AI was used to produce this article.
I think we should not lose sight of the fact that the WHO, like any other multi-national organization, can't make any country comply. The accord will be used as an excuse for politicians and bureaucrats to deny any responsibility for future actions. They will say "We don't really want to do these things to you, but what can we do; we have to comply!" We are being gaslit into believing that these organizations and agreements constitute some sort of world government. Remember that the U.S withdrew from UNESCO twice. The funding of these organizations and the enforcement of their decisions comes 100% from the sovereign states that voluntarily chose to belong.
Thank you, Noor, for all of your work on deciphering the WHO 'accords', and getting the word out. Thanks to James also.
I'm wondering if the language of these 'accords' might allow some extreme measures to be taken, even beyond a pandemic like cov-19.
I think it's possible that Tedros, et al, will also be able to declare a 'global mental health emergency', and declare that mis-, mal-, and dis-information are disrupting the mental health of the entire planet, and therefore there immediate censorship measures need to be implemented worldwide. Maybe censorship and requiring the population to be prescribed tranquilizers and sedatives.
Maybe they might declare population growth is out of control and has reached global emergency status. They could mandate measures which would be catastrophic mentally, physically, and spiritually.
These are just a few more of the problems which could arise from these dangerous accords.
I'm with you. Two months to flatten the WHO!